Wednesday, September 26, 2007

from the forum... Barry speaks out about a recent National Geographic (aug 07) article:

Talk about pissed me off!!!! I read the entire "controversial" article in NG about the current state of New Orleans. The entire article sides with the argument that our city can not be helped and it should be allowed to be reclaimed by the Gulf and the Miss. River. It does finger the Corps of Engineers for botching their jobs and making bad decisions since 1965. It also suggests that local leadership has historically steered flood protection money toward pet projects that were known to be less effective and less expensive but more profitable for developers. Granted, all of this has plenty of merit and likely grounded in truth. Much of what is cited as scientific inevitability regarding hurricane activity cycles, polar ice melting, and global warming is open to interpretation across the scientific community. Certainly, looking at worst case scenarios helps to be prepared for them, as well as lesser scenarios. What made me angry was that the article paints a picture of New Orleanians as blindly charging toward a disasterous destiny. Our primary modes of denial appear to be an "ask me no questions I'll tell you no lies" unshakable faith in... no dependency upon.. our levee system. Our other sin of denial is described by the author as "love of home" which is presented as an undesirable illness that afflicts us. Well, if you don't understand it Jack, it's because you don't live here!!! It's easy to say "pull up the stakes and pack your pack your bags" when you are used to a lesser lifestyle than you can find here in NO. This city is and will remain the most interesting and unique city in this nation. It has all the natural resources to be the one the most economically important as well. Instead the city is floundering due to inadequate leadership nationally,
statewide and locally. Yes, all of us here are optimists. That's because we know how great this city is and how much better it can be with good leadership. The naysayers had better get on the right page as well. The article quotes a Holland born researcher at Tulane University as saying that the US turning it's back on NO would be equivalent to losing Amsterdam or Venice, Italy. It makes little mention, however, that the most perilous issue that we face is the lack of leadership with-in.

No comments: